Antoinette Cosway’s Struggle for Peace and Sanity Essay Example Essay Example

Antoinette Cosway’s Struggle for Peace and Sanity Essay Example Paper Antoinette Cosway’s Struggle for Peace and Sanity Essay Introduction Jean Rhys’s =:///sandra-drake/ class=ilgen data-wpel-link=external rel=nofollow>Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) tells about the life of Antoinette, a white Creole, and her search for her own identity as she struggles for peace and sanity amidst the conflicting perspective of British, West Indies and Creoles social and racial divisions. The setting is basically informative of Antoinette’s developed double consciousness. Being placed in Jamaica and Dominica, Antoinette is forced to fit in within the two extremes. Yet as she grows and encounters inevitable life circumstances brought about these social and racial issues, and as she experiences death and insanity even in her own family, she deliberately and painfully realized that she can never belong to any of the two. As such, she pushed herself into isolation and despair.The novel basically started out as a recreation of Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre. Although the main character in the novel, Bertha, is described as a â₠¬Å"monster, violent, insane and promiscuous,† Rhys portrayed Antoinette as â€Å"a sympathetic and vulnerable young woman who seeks, unsuccessfully, to belong.† Indeed, critics were emphatically attuned to the enriched attribution of Antoinette’s life imbalances to conflicting social and racial factors. Attention to the merit of her work brought her the prestigious W.H. Smith Award and the Heinemann Award of the Royal Society for Literature. It was also named by Time Magazine as one of the 100 best English-language novels since 1923. These and other awards consequently rescued her from deep depression, alcohol addiction and isolation before its publication.Connection between the life of Antoinette Cosway and her author is inevitably noticeable. The author herself is the third child of a Creole mother and a Welsh doctor. Her ancestors on her mother side are known to be slaveholders. She grew up in Dominica and she moved to England while she was a teenager. Much li ke her main character, Jean Rhys despises England and she attributes her isolation and depression from the conflict of the White and the Black races. Perhaps, the novel served as a medium for her to express her mixed feelings towards her social status and the bigger community in which she grew.The emancipation of the slaves in 1834 is the starting point of the conflict. Although the racial and social conflict between the British, the Creoles and the West Indies was set even before this, this particular event produced a new set of social issues. Before freeing the slaves, racial distinction is high; everyone knows their places – the Jamaicans are slaves, the Creoles are the slaveholders, and the British are the rich people who own the entire place. â€Å"Thus multifaceted power structure [is] revealed within Rhys’ narrative† (Paul, 2004). However, upon freeing the slaves, the Creoles were left with nothing to identify themselves with, except their culture represe nted in the story as the black magic of Cristophine. Indeed, it is through the practice of this that Antoinette showed independence and glee. She was overly confident of her ability to read omens, and she turned for a magic love potion to fix the marital relationship problem with his unnamed husband. However, the event did not only leave her to question her racial identity. It brought her a set of new problems to deal with, problems overwhelmingly enormous for her age: the death of her father, the insanity of her mother, the hatred of the slaves, and betrayal of a friend. During the course of her life, she tried to live normally; but in a world of conflicting culture, a strong and stable identity serves as a shield to protect her from insanity.Among the social issues presented in the novel are poverty, violence, injustice, suppression of human rights, and discrimination. Particularly obvious in the novel is the issue of slavery and entrapment. Although the Emancipation Act freed the slaves, it lacked the necessary subsequent rights to enable them to live a normal life. The law failed to provide them with enough compensation to have a job that could sustain their everyday living, so that instead of celebrating their freedom, the West Indians breed hostility from the Creoles who left them with nothing to eat and who started to limit their lifestyle as slaves. Thus, for the Jamaicans, the Act did not free them at all; superficial and problematic, the Act served to only worsen the lives of the Blacks. Setting the social issue aside, however, slavery and entrapment is not only applicable to the Jamaicans. The Creoles were the most affected in terms of developing their racial identity.Being primarily slaveholders themselves, their main source of income entrapped them into thinking that they cannot move beyond that which socially defined them. Thus, the emancipation of the slaves brought them with nothing to showcase. Without slaves, they were in same social status a s the previous slaves. Although they may appear financially richer, in the long run, the social distinction between the slave and the master is gone. Furthermore, the death of Antoinette’s father revealed the strong patriarchy in Jamaica. Anette, her mother, felt helplessly imprisoned with his death, and she only regained her composure after meeting the British Mr. Mason. â€Å"Fragmentation is also evident in Antoinette’s own ethnic status, which has profound implications for the resulting power imbalances† (Paul, 2004).Lastly, Rhys ended the novel with Antoinette being entrapped in England, in a room under the watch of servant named Grace Pool. Figuratively, this event returns the novel from the beginning of the conflict. The room represents the range of power of the British people, the servant represents the Jamaican slaves, and Antoinette serves as the representative of the Creole slaveholders. The author made a very interesting point here. Metaphorically, i t showed that the social status of the British people points to the entrapment of the Creoles and the Jamaicans, that the Creoles are practically more enslaved than the Jamaicans and that the latter can clearly see it, and that the key to freeing the Creoles lies on their slaves all along. Although it started as a dream for Antoinette, the author expressed optimism to putting the dream into a reality.Another important theme in the novel is the complexity of racial identity as highlighted by Alexander Cosway’s illegitimate children. Aside from the distinction between the British, the Creoles and the West Indians, the Blacks have their own kinds of stratification. Originally from Martinique, a French Caribbean island, Cristophine stands apart from the Black community. Furthermore, Americans and slave owners are known to rape their slaves and produce illegitimate children who do not know which side they should place and categorize themselves in the society. Not only do legal rig hts define the mixture of races in Jamaica, social interaction and geography also underscores the differences between them. Although physical distinction does not apply well to the half-breeds, social interaction spells how each race view one another. And alongside this, racial identity clearly becomes racial discrimination, creating double consciousness for those who are midway to who they are and who they should be: â€Å"That’s not what she hear, she said. She hear all we poor like beggar. We ate salt fish-no money for fresh fish. That old house so leaky, you run with calabash to catch water when it rain. Plenty white people in Jamaica. Real white people, they got gold money. They didn’t look at us, nobody see them come near us. Old time white people nothing but white nigger now, and black nigger better than white nigger† (Rhys, 1966; Halloran, 2006).Important motifs in the novel also clarify some of the issues presented in the novel. Madness, disease and dea th are recurring motifs revolving around the life of Antoinette. Everyone underwent some kind of madness in the novel, particularly among the Creoles and her family. Antoinette’s madness may be interpreted as the major reason behind her demise. But Rhys was able to clear this possible nuisance by highlighting the maddening conditions of their life. Although it may be true and realistically safe to claim that the Cosways are prone or have tendency to be mad, it is also true that long stressful situations are the main caused to trigger such cases. Also, Rhys included the incident where Antoinette’s unnamed husband only noticed her â€Å"madness† when her illegitimate brother told him about it. This incident could therefore mean that â€Å"madness† is largely a result of how the British see it, that inside a Creole’s life, this â€Å"madness† is a normal phenomenon. Yet what colors this motif is that it presents doubt to the readers on whether to believe Antoinette or not.However, Rhys was able to answer this issue in the end as she intentionally showed that Antoinette’s imagined reality can actually be real. Ironically, the â€Å"statement† simply puts that madness is as real as it actually seems. Likewise, madness is intricately related to disease and decline. Through these, Rhys was able to show (not tell) the effects of the society on the individual. Near-fatal fevers both to Antoinette and Rochester metaphorically address the ill-effects of the social situation on the lives of individual people. It is also a mark or a warning of the unrest of the social situation. Thus, even if Antoinette believed at the start of the novel that the cure for her â€Å"sickness† is in England, further decline in her health during her stay there reflects the inability of the society to cater to their needs. It also reflects that geographic replacement can never make her belong and fit in the British society. Lastly, death is the major blow for madness in the family, and it leads to isolation and depression. Tragically, through death, almost all of Antoinette’s family members deserted her. The good thing, however, is that it is also through her isolation that she finds the truth behind her enslavement and despair.The Wide Sargasso Sea indeed â€Å"suggest[s] that social demarcations between English and Creole cultural identities are artificial because they ultimately depend on chance-on the geographical accident of a given person’s or character’s place of birth† (Halloran, 2006). But this artificiality has continued to enslave the lives not only of Antoinette, but of all the characters in the story. Perhaps, the novel was a medium for Rhys to prompt the readers to reexamine the influence of society. It is not that the novel seeks to put the blame upon the society per se; rather, it is a call to notice the larger force that influences our behavior and to help us judge and define the boundaries from which we should allow it to rule us. Thus, Antoinette’s imbalance in her life is due to social and racial issues than to a personal deficiency.Works CitedHalloran, V. N. (2006). Race, creole, and national identities in Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea and Phillips’s Cambridge. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism, 21, 87-104.Paul, N. (2004). Other ways of looking: The female gaze in Jean Rhys’ Wide Sargasso Sea. eSharp, 2 (spring 2004). Retrieved April 27, 2008, from =http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/esharp/issues/2/paul/ data-wpel-link=external rel=nofollow>http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/esharp/issues/2/paul/Rhys, J. (1966). Wide Sargasso Sea. NY: Norton ; Co.; Antoinette Cosway’s Struggle for Peace and Sanity Essay Thank you for reading this Sample!

Public Health During the Industrial Revolution

Public Health During the Industrial Revolution One important impact of the industrial revolution (such as the use of coal, iron, and steam) was rapid urbanization, as new and expanding industry caused villages and towns to swell, sometimes into vast cities. The Port of Liverpool, for example, rose from a population of a couple of thousand to many tens of thousands in the space of a century. As a result, these towns became hotbeds of disease and depredation, prompting a debate in Britain about public health. Its important to remember that science wasnt as advanced as today, so people didnt know exactly what was going wrong, and the speed of changes was pushing government and charities structures in new and strange ways. But there was always a group of people who looked at the new stresses on the new urban workers and were willing to campaign to solve them. The Problems of Town Life in the Nineteenth Century Towns tended to be segregated by class, and working-class neighborhoods where the everyday laborer lived had the worst conditions. As the governing classes lived in different areas they never saw these conditions, and protests from the workers were ignored. Housing was generally bad and made worse by the numbers of people constantly arriving in cities. The most common housing pattern was high-density back-to-back structures which were poor, damp, badly ventilated with few kitchens and many sharing a single tap and privy. In this overcrowding, disease spread easily. 1829 George Cruikshank editorial cartoon illustrating the explosive growth of London. Print Collector/Getty Images / Getty Images There was also inadequate drainage and sewerage, and what sewers there were tended to be square, stuck in the corners, and built of porous brick. Waste was frequently left in the streets and most people shared privies which emptied into cesspits. What open spaces there were also tended to be filled with rubbish, and the air and water were polluted by factories and slaughterhouses. The satirical cartoonists of the day didnt have to imagine a hell to illustrate in these cramped, poorly designed cities. Consequently, there was much illness, and in 1832 one doctor said only 10% of Leeds was actually in full health. In fact, despite technological developments, the death rate rose, and infant mortality was very high. There was also a range of common diseases: tuberculosis, typhus, and after 1831, cholera. The terrible working environments created new occupational hazards, such as lung disease and bone deformities. The 1842 report by the British social reformer Edwin Chadwick called Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring  Population of Great Britain showed that the life expectancy of an urban dweller was less than that of a rural one, and this was also affected by class. Why Public Health Was Slow to Be Dealt With Before 1835, town administration was weak, poor and too impotent to meet the demands of new urban life. There were few representative elections to produce forums for people who were worse off to speak, and there was little power in the hands of town planners, even after such a job was created by necessity. Revenues tended to be spent on large, new civic buildings. Some regions had chartered boroughs with rights, and others found themselves governed by a lord of the manor, but all these arrangements were too out-of-date to deal with the speed of urbanization. Scientific ignorance also played a role, as people simply didn’t know what caused the diseases that afflicted them. There was self-interest too, as builders wanted profits, not better quality housing, and the government-held a deep prejudice about the poors worthiness of efforts. Chadwick’s influential sanitary report of 1842 divided people into ‘clean’ and ‘dirty’ parties and some people believed Chadwick wanted the poor to be made clean against their will Government attitudes also played a role. It was commonly thought that the laissez-faire system, in which governments didn’t interfere in the lives of adult men, was the only reasonable system, and it was only late in the process that government became willing to undertake reform and humanitarian action. The prime motivation then was cholera, not ideology. The Municipal Corporations Act of 1835 In 1835 a commission was appointed to look into municipal government.  It was badly organized, but the report published was deeply critical of what it called ‘chartered hogsties.’ A law with limited effect was passed, but newly created councils were given few powers and were expensive to form. Nevertheless, this wasnt a failure, as it set the pattern for the English government and made possible the later public health acts. Beginnings of the Sanitary Reform Movement A group of doctors wrote two reports in 1838 on the living conditions in London’s Bethnal Green. They drew attention to the connection between unsanitary conditions, disease, and pauperism. The Bishop of London then called for a national survey. Chadwick, a force in all things public service in the mid-eighteenth century, mobilized the medical officers provided by the Poor Law and created his 1842 report which highlighted the problems associated with class and residence. It was damning and sold a huge number of copies. Amongst its recommendations were an arterial system for clean water and the replacement of improvement commissions by a single body with power.  Many objected to Chadwick and some wags in the government claimed they preferred cholera to him. As a result of Chadwick’s report, though, the Health of Towns Association was formed in 1844, and branches all over England researched and published on their local conditions. Meanwhile, the government was recommended to introduce public health reforms by other sources in 1847. By this stage, some municipal governments had acted on their own initiative and passed private acts of Parliament to force through changes. Cholera Highlights the Need A cholera epidemic left India in 1817 and reached Sunderland in late 1831; London was affected by February 1832. Fifty percent of all cases proved fatal. Some towns set up quarantine boards, and they promoted whitewashing (cleaning clothing with chloride of lime) and speedy burials, but they were targeting disease under the miasma theory that disease was caused by floating vapors rather than the unrecognized infectious bacterium. Several leading surgeons recognized that cholera prevailed where sanitation and drainage were poor, but their ideas for improvement were temporarily ignored. In 1848 cholera returned to Britain, and the government resolved that something had to be done. The Public Health Act of 1848 The first Public Health act was passed in 1848 based on the recommendations of a Royal Commission. The act created a central Board of Health with a five-year mandate, to be considered for renewal at the end of that period. Three commissioners, including Chadwick, and a medical officer were appointed to the board. Wherever the death rate was worse than 23/1000, or where 10% of ratepayers requested assistance, the board would send an inspector to  authorize the town council to carry out duties and form a local board. These authorities would have powers over drainage, building regulations, water supplies,  paving, and rubbish. Inspections were to be carried out, and loans could be given. Chadwick took the opportunity to push his new interest in sewer technology to the local authorities. The act did not have much potency, because while it had the power to appoint boards and inspectors, that wasnt required, and local works were frequently held up by legal and financial obstacles. It was, however, much cheaper to set up a board than previously, with a local one costing just  £100. Some towns ignored the national board and set up their own private committees to avoid central interference. The central board worked hard, and between 1840 and 1855 they posted a hundred thousand letters, although it lost much of its teeth when Chadwick was forced from office and a switch to annual renewal was made. Overall, the act is considered to have failed as the death rate remained the same, and the problems remained, but it did establish a precedent for government intervention. Public Health after 1854 The central board was disbanded in 1854. By the mid-1860s, the government had come to a more positive and interventionist approach, spurred on by the 1866 cholera epidemic that clearly revealed the flaws in the earlier act. A set of innovations aided the progress, as in 1854 English physician John Snow showed how cholera could be spread by a water pump, and in 1865 Louis Pasteur demonstrated his germ theory of disease. The ability to vote was expanded to the urban working class in 1867, and politicians now had to make promises regarding public health to gain votes. Local authorities also began to take more of a lead. The 1866 Sanitary Act forced towns to appoint inspectors to check that water supplies and drainage were adequate. The 1871 Local Government Board Act placed public health and the poor law in the hands of empowered local governmental bodies and came about because of an 1869 Royal Sanitary Commission which recommended strong local government. 1875 Public Health Act In 1872 there was a Public Health Act, which split the country into sanitary areas, each of which had a medical officer. In 1875 Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli saw that several acts aimed at social improvements were passed, such as a new Public Health Act and an Artisan’s Dwellings Act. A Food and Drink Act was passed to attempt to improve diet. This set of public health acts rationalized previous legislation and was extremely influential. Local authorities were made responsible for a range of public health issues and given the powers to enforce decisions, including sewage, water, drains, waste disposal, public works, and lighting. These acts marked the beginning of a genuine, workable public health strategy, with responsibility shared between the local and national government, and the death rate finally began to fall. Further improvements were boosted by scientific discoveries. Koch discovered micro-organisms and separated out germs, including tuberculosis in 1882 and cholera in 1883. Vaccines were developed. Public health can still be a problem, but the changes in the role of government established in this period, both perceived and actual, are mostly ingrained into the modern consciousness and provide a working strategy to ameliorate problems as they arise.

Myself or Others Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Myself or Others - Case Study Example As much as one takes care of self-interest, he or she should have principles. The things that a person does will either positively or negatively influence his or her relationships. No one is an island; we all need people one way or another. Ethical egoism compared to ethical altruism is far apart, the former deals with self-interest while the latter deals with moral obligation to others. In the middle, there is utilitarianism which is independent and neutral. These are the major categories that different cultures fall into. Some cultures believe that, once parents become incapable of taking care of the family it becomes responsibility of the older child. This is a moral obligation that does not allow one to choose, which may lead to two different sentiments. One may take it positively and actually embrace the idea of being responsible for the others, putting his or own interests on hold. This is a great concept only when it does not turn one into a pauper. What am I saying? The fact that one can take care of others, simply means that they can afford to have basics. If they cannot have even mere basics because of others needs then it is morally wrong (Nina R, 2012) Another person may take it negatively, because he or she is just selfish in nature or may not understand why he or she should take responsibility, which is meant for parents. A person ends up doing it but, with a lot of protest. In both cases, the interest of a person may be delayed or even may remain unexecuted. As a result, there are things that may come up; for example, resentment towards the recipients, one may end up being a dwarf when it comes to development and at times because of fate, one may end up having unaccomplished dreams. According to me, an individual is supposed to balance. It is good to help parents and the community at large with regard to your capabilities. One has to ensure his or her comfort

Proposal to add a Day Care Facility at Work Essay

Proposal to add a Day Care Facility at Work - Essay Example Contemporary business leaders require dynamic workers who are capable of meeting the demands of a high-stress and competitive work environment. From a theoretical perspective, these workers would need to be both motivated and free of distraction to avoid performance-related failures. Hence, in many respects, as today’s businesses are often focused on teamwork and team-building philosophies, it becomes the responsibility of the business leaders to invent new and innovative measures to boost employee morale and job satisfaction. Our facility, ABC Industries, a leader in manufacture and sale of technological components for automotive sound systems, maintains a staff of nearly 800, running on two split 12 hour shifts. In this high-stress environment, turnover ratios have been significantly high in recent months due to production demands, putting a significant strain on the human resources budget. Additionally, worker performance on the production floor has been down nearly 25 percent in the same time period due to worker anxiety over personal versus work-related schedule conflicts. Recent communications and anonymous surveys with production workers have indicated a desperate need for a corporate day care facility to assist in the demands of balancing home and work life. Many of ABC’s staff members have suggested that high gasoline prices combined with escalating day care costs have made them financially-motivated to find other employment which might offer a more lucrative salary package. This is something ABC Industries cannot afford. In this difficult economic environment, budgetary guidelines need to constantly be considered. However, the costs to the business in terms of reduced productivity and turnover expenses far exceed the costs associated with managing an in-house day care facility. Budgetary issues will be outlined in greater depth throughout this proposal, however it is appropriate to discuss its

The Road to Integrated School Systems Essay Example for Free

The Road to Integrated School Systems Essay In 1986, the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court case established that there could be separate but equal facilities for blacks and whites, giving support to Jim Crow laws. The Supreme Court did not begin to reverse Plessy until the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court case 58 years later, which established that segregating blacks and whites was unconstitutional and that separate could never be equal. After the period of reconstruction following the Civil War, many states in the south and other regions of the country passed laws that discriminated against African-Americans. These laws ranged from restrictions on voting to requirements that blacks and whites use separate facilities and attend separate schools. On June 7, 1892, Homer A. Plessy, a man who was one-eighth black and seven-eighths white, bought a train ticket to travel from New Orleans to Covington, Louisiana. Under Louisiana law, he was considered black and was required to ride in the colored car. Because Plessy sat in the whites only car, he was arrested and put in jail in New Orleans (Frost-Knappman). Plessy faced trial for his crime of riding in a railroad car for whites only. John A. Ferguson presided over his trial in federal district court. He was found guilty, and the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld his conviction. Plessy then appealed to the United States Supreme Court for an order forbidding Louisiana-in the person of Judge Ferguson-from carrying out his conviction (Frost-Knappman). On April 13, 1896, Plessys lawyers argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. Their argument was that Louisiana had violated Plessys 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law (Cozzens). Attorney General Cunningham argued that the law merely made a distinction between blacks and whites and did not necessarily treat blacks as inferiors (Cozzens). On May 18, 1896, the court issued its decision, upholding the Louisiana law: A [law] which implies merely a legal distinction between the wh ite and colored racesa distinction which is founded in the color of the two races, and which must always exist so long a white men are distinguished from the other race by colorhas no tendency to destroy the legal equality of the two races (Frost-Knappman). The court also endorsed the separate but equal doctrine, ignoring the fact that blacks had almost no control over how equal black and white facilities were (Frost-Knappman). In years to come, black schools, railroad cars, and other facilities were very rarely as good as those of whites. For the next 58 years blacks continued to be discriminated against through segregation. This led to the 1954 Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education. Brown was an eight-year-old girl named Linda and was the daughter of Oliver Brown, a quiet, hard-working man who served as an assistant pastor and sexton at St. John African Methodist Epicostal Church in Topeka, Kansas (A Moment in History). Linda Brown attended a school that was more than three miles from her home. Her trip to school involved a six-block walk along the train tracks to catch a bus that took her the rest of the way (Pratt). In 1950, Oliver Brown sought to enroll his daughter at the nearby white Sumner Elementary School (Hollaway ). The superintendent, Kenneth McFarland, had always favored segregation and informed Brown that Topeka was not yet ready to make the change (Hollaway). The school board supported McFarland in his decision (Hollaway). On August 25, 1950, Lucinda Todd, secretary of the local NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), wrote to the national office in New York, saying that the school situation in Topeka had grown unbearable and that the local branch was willing to go to court to challenge the Kansas law. Local attorneys Charles Bledsoe, John Scott, and Charles Scott drew up the legal papers. However, it was not easy to find blacks willing to serve as plaintiffs in the case. Lucinda Todd was the first to volunteer. Eventually, twelve others followed. All were the parents of children who had been denied admission to white schools, and all were women except for Oliver Brown who was listed as the lead plaintiff (Pratt). The case was officially filed with the U.S. District Court for Kansas on February 28, 1951. Though sympathetic with the plaintiffs argument, the District Court unanimously refused to grant relief (Cozzens). Immediately after the lower courts ruling, the NAACP attorneys began to prepare their appeal. Similar school desegregation suits were being filed in the District of Columbia, Delaware, Virginia, and South Carolina. The central issue of the cases shifted from unequal funding to the fact that segregation was unconstitutional and a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. In December 1952, the Supreme court decided to group the five cases together and hear them simultaneously. The cases became known as Brown v. Board of Education (Cozzens). On May 17, 1954, Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote for a unanimous court that separate education facilities are inherently unequal. In summing up the courts opinion Warren concluded: To separate [black children] from others of similar age solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community. In 1955, the court handed down its enforcement decree in Brown II, which said that the desegr egation of public schools should proceed with deliberate speed (Hollaway). Ironically, Linda Brown had by this time started to attend an integrated middle school. However, thousands of other children benefited from the courts decision (Pratt). Eventually this decision would be used to dispel other segregation laws and practices. For example, the separate but equal doctrine was abolished (Frost-Knappman). Today, de facto segregation still exists in some areas because of residential patterns and other factors. However, much progress has been made. Were it not for the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court case, The U.S. would probably not be quite so far along in the quest for public integration of races. Works Cited Cozzens, Lisa. Brown v. Board of Education. 29 June 1998. 14 April 2002 . . Plessy v. Ferguson. 17 Sep. 1999. 18 April 2002 . Frost-Knappman, Elizabeth, Edward W. Knappman, Lisa Paddock, eds. Courtroom Drama. 1998. New England Publishing Associates, Inc. Hollaway, Kevin. The RulingBrown v. Board of Education. Civil Rights: A Status Report. 13 Dec. 1996. 14 April 2002 . A Moment in History: Brown v. Board of Education. Learning Network. 14 April 2002 . Pratt, Robert A. Segregation Overruled. National Parks. Sep./Oct. 1993.

Business Plan for New Airline Essay examples -- Essays Papers

Business Plan for New Airline HausAir Mission Statement HausAir fixed base operation will provide the highest quality of flight instruction and comfortable charter services to the public; without compromising an ounce of safety, at a price lower than the competition. Human Resources/ Management Functions Breakdown of initial staff to begin at HausAir. (1) Manager/Owner Jason Bushouse (1) Assistant Manager Jeff Doyle (5) Receptionist/Clerical Jason Henderson (Full Time) Julie Vanek (Full Time) Roseanne Francis (Full Time) Pamela Laurie (Full Time) Art Wegner (Part Time) (6) Flight Instructors (Chief) Adam MacDonald (Full Time) Brent Ivey (Full Time) Janessa Luncford (Full Time) James Bushouse (Full Time) Ron Hallaux (Full Time) Randy Renolds (Full Time) (4) Pilot (Chief) Jason Bushouse Tim Dolenz Trevor Blackmer Dwayne Clemmens (4) Mechanics (Chief) Greg Radd (IA; Full Time) Lee Coss (A&P; Full Time) Joan Laukner (A&P; Full Time) Miguel Sanchez (A&P; Full Time) (4) Line Attendents Josh Hodny (Full Time) Mara Kennelly (Full Time) Brett Carlson (Part Time) Tommy Snellings (Part Time) (1) Sales Personnel Mike Campea FBO Organizational Chart Flight Office Service Finance Sales Job Description: Flight Instructor The HausAir flight instructors will follow some basic guidelines. They will be responsible for: - Student training for appropriate licenses - Maintaining proficiency in maneuvers - Proficiency required flight knowledge - Proficiency instructional techniques - Promoting a positive image of general aviation - Perform duties assigned by chief pilot - Maintaining safe and professional habits The position requires a minimum commercial multi-engine land instrument airplane and CFI certificate and those without a CFII will be expected to obtain the certificate within 6 months of start date. Instructors must be able to train a student from wherever their current ability level is to proficiency to the practical test standards for the certificate desired. Instructors will be required to follow HausAir flight training syllabus unless there is prior approval from the chief flight instructor. Instructors will be expected to give biannual flight reviews, checkouts to customers planning to rent aircraft an... ...n income of $5480 with a profit of 2200 a month. Fuel will be stored and fueled by the fuel truck. Line service will fuel all incoming aircraft, regardless of size. Supplies HausAir will carry a wide selection of supplies and keep current with charts, approach plates, books and other aviation publications. We can make between 40-60% profit but will charge what competitors like sportys pilot shop charge. We will match their price and work prices around that range. Insurance Insurance is an important protection for this FBO. Due to the high amount of risk involved in aviation it will be important to hold monthly safety meetings, and have rotating safety officer schedule that will change every day. There are many different kinds of insurance that we must purchase. Some of the insurance coverage that is required: Aircraft hull Aircraft liability Passenger liability Hangar liability Product liability Fire and Natural disaster coverage Auto full coverage Comprehensive public liability Bibliography http://www.airplane.com/be58.htm Richardson, Rodwell, & Baty (1995) Essentials of Aviation Management. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Gay Marriage Speech

Gay Marriage Speech What comes to mind when you hear the word marriage? Is it the big wedding? The white dress? The rings? The kiss? The repeating of vows? Or is it the stress of making It all happen? Marriage Is a special moment in our lives. Fora lot of us marriage is a major milestone, a transformation In Identity to being a married person rather than single. But on top of all this, marriage is an important legal status. Nothing says â€Å"love and commitment† like the word marriage.It is essential to know that there are two kinds of marriage ceremonies: Civil and Religious marriage. A civil marriage is arriage performed by a government official and not a religious organization. Clvll marriage covers inheritance rights, property rights, the right to visit one another in the hospital, the conveying of benefits etc. Then there is Religious marriage; this is interpreted by each religious group differently, but is usually conducted in a church, chapel or temple.Everyone wants t o find love; to be In a serious relationship made up of trust and commitment. whether your sexual orientation be straight, gay, lesbian or bisexual. Though the rights to marry isnt equal for homosexual couples as it is for heterosexual couples. Some of the main and most important reasons people choose to ban homosexual marriage Is because they are homophobic and/or think It Is morally and biologically wrong for the human being and society. People with homophobia have an extreme and irrational aversion to homosexuality and homosexual people.Opinionated outlooks directed at homosexuals often branch from the perception that homosexual activity Is Immoral. Homophobia makes some people think that they are superior to homosexuals. In fact. studies show that antl- gay bias is far more accepted among large numbers of Americans than is bias gainst other minorities. Majority of the people who think that Gay marriage is â€Å"morally† wrong are religious. They study the words of the bib le, and feel that being gay Is a sin and will prevent you from being able to enter Into heaven.From King James' Version of the Bible, in Leviticus 20:13: â€Å"If a man also lie with a mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death, their blood shall be upon them† Another piece of scripture implying that being gay is a sin Is In the New Testaments, I Corinthians 6:9-11 Know ye, not hat the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdoms of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extrotioners, shall inherit In the kingdom of God. Meaning that people who commit sexual Intercourse out of marriage, who worship Idols other than god, who cheat, who have characteristics of a woman or unmanly(gay), who abuse, who are Jealous, who are habitually drunk, who verbally abuse and blackmail/steal will not go to heaven. This scripture basically lists he sin of homosexuality as one of the specific sins that will literally keep you from being able to enter Into heaven when you die and cross over. With marriage comes the hopes and dreams of having children and starting a family.This is where anti- gays feel that accepting gay marriage would be â€Å"biologically† wrong to society. Same ‘OF3 sex Intercourse wlll not nelp wltn tne reproauctlon 0T any Inalvlaual. Its more a way for gay promiscuity to increase. Consequently, if no off springs will be produced, and if gay marriage were to be legalized throughout the world we'll lead to a fail in opulation and to increase in elderly individuals, similar to what is happening in Japan. Yet in the Netherlands, Belgium, Canda, Spain, South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Iceland and Argentina, gay marriage was granted between the years 2001-2010.In These countries and all over the world there are people who support gay mar riage and there are people who do not. For instance Mike Judge, from the Christian Institute in the United Kingdom, suggests that the value of marriage will decrease if gay marriage is legalized in the United States as it was in the I-JK. In his ideo he expresses his views on how same-sex marriage would affect â€Å"everybodys† marriage, by using an analogy between opposite sex marriage and gay marriage.He does so by using an American 5 dollar bill symbolizing opposite sex marriage, calling it â€Å"real and genuine , but imagine if a counterfeit 5 dollar bill (symbolizing gay marriage) flooded the US economy. The American 5 dollar bill will continue to be real and genuine, but its value in the economy would be seriously damaged. If the special rights of marriage are given to any other relationship then the special values f marriage will diminish and that is what we've seen In the I-JK. I don't want to see that happening in the United States†, said Mike Judge.But littl e did he know that, that same year when Civil Partnership Act was legalized in the I-JK, Massachusetts legalized same sex marriage, being the first in the United States with 5 other sprawling behind (Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire and District of Colombia). But is gay marriage really such a bad idea as people might think? Straight and gay are Just the same, they experience the same feelings, emotions and thoughts ust like any other human. So there should clearly be the same rights for people with both kinds of â€Å"sexual preferences†.But should there be? Or should we as people of the world strip these rights from the â€Å"gay' community? Ignoring their rights as a human being? In the United States our forefathers wrote â€Å"that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness† and that we should â€Å"hold these truths to be self-evidentâ € . Clearly the six states that granted gay arriage took this well into consideration and finally made it law.And in the Holy Bible , King James' version, I Peter 2:13-14 says â€Å"Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake: Whether it be to the king as supreme; or unto governors, as unto them are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well. † Meaning that we, the children of God must abide by the rules/ laws set up by higher authority, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right. So the question is, isn't same sex marriage ltimately right since it is now law?